IUL Increasing Death Benefit with Return of Premium

More in this post on American General’s Value+Proctor III Indexed Universal Life (IUL) focusing on the increasing death benefit option rather than level death benefit.

Male 42 years old, preferred plus, $250 per month premium all years, solve face amount, target premium, increasing death benefit, S&P 500 index annual point to point, hypothetical 5.00% interest crediting all years.

Monthly premiums: $250
Initial Death Benefit: $344,756

Year 25 Total premium outlay: $75,000
Year 25 Guaranteed Return of Premium: $75,000
Year 25 Guaranteed Death Benefit: $366,063

5.00% hypothetical
Year 25 Non-Guaranteed Cash Surrender Value: $93,252
Year 25 Non-Guaranteed Death Benefit: $438,009

3.70% hypothetical
Year 25 Non-Guaranteed Cash Surrender Value: $78,848
Year 25 Non-Guaranteed Death Benefit: $423,604

age 83 no-lapse guarantee (NLG, ULSG)

Guideline level premium: $18,895.80
7-pay premium: $23,855.94

The guideline level premium in monthly premiums is $1,574.65 (18,895.80 divided by 12). Here’s looking at this same basic structure: same initial death benefit with this maximum non-MEC premium. MEC stands for Modified Endowment Contract, the maximum allowed under IRS rules for favorable tax consideration.

Monthly premiums: $1,574.65
Initial Death Benefit: $344,756

Year 25 Total premium outlay: $472,395
Year 25 Guaranteed Cash Value Accumulation: $351,631
Year 25 Guaranteed Death Benefit: $696,390

5.00% hypothetical
Year 25 Non-Guaranteed Cash Surrender Value: $732,360
Year 25 Non-Guaranteed Death Benefit: $1,077,120

3.70% hypothetical
Year 25 Non-Guaranteed Cash Surrender Value: $612,491
Year 25 Non-Guaranteed Death Benefit: $957,251

age 103 no-lapse guarantee (NLG, ULSG)

Guideline level premium: $18,895.80
7 pay premium: 23,855.88

Comments: The strategy is to begin the policy at an affordable level $250 a month and at some point go up higher, to $500 a month or whatever, up to $1,574 a month, the guideline level. Premiums can fluctuate up and down at any time. The 7-pay premium limit could boost that $1,574 monthly figure even higher. Just monitor premium limit by either the guideline level or 7-pay test. Increasing premiums may negate the full return of premium (ROP) option in year 25 but would help maximize cash value accumulation, as much as possible without the policy becoming a MEC. Note the 5.00% and 3.70% interest crediting are truly hypothetical for illustrations. No market index performs with steady results each and every year, and averages may vary given changes to participation rates, caps, and cost of insurance charges. What’s notable with this American General IUL product are the guarantees.

Indexed Universal Life (IUL) case study age 50

Indexed Universal Life (IUL) #1 carrier

design: Male, age 50, preferred non-tobacco, $250 monthly planned premium, solve for minimum face amount (no MEC or guideline premium violation), index strategy: S&P 500 cap rate account, 100% allocation, assuming 5.00% all years (maximum illustrative rate 6.27%); death benefit option: increasing; death benefit compliance test: guideline; no optional riders.

Initial death benefit: $50,000
premium outlay: $3,000 annual

Initial Guideline Level Premium: $3,575.61
Initial Guideline Single Premium: $19,939.36
Seven Pay Premium: $4,000.56

Results

non guaranteed values: year 20 @5.00% all years
cash surrender value $74,991
death benefit $124,991
total premium outlay $60,000 ($250/month)

non guaranteed values: year 20 @5.50% all years
cash surrender value $79,132
death benefit $129,132
premium outlay $60,000 ($250/month)

non guaranteed values: year 20 @6.00% all years
cash surrender value $83,539
death benefit $133,539
premium outlay $60,000 ($250/month)

Maximum non-MEC results

Guideline Level Premium: $3,575.61 annual
non guaranteed values: year 20 @5.00% all years
cash surrender value $91,039
death benefit $141,039
premium outlay $71,510 ($297.96/month) (297.96 x 12 = 3,575.52 no MEC)

Guideline Level Premium: $3,575.61
non guaranteed values: year 20 @6.00% all years
cash surrender value $101,434
death benefit $151,434
premium outlay $71,510 ($297.96/month)

IUL case study: Male age 40

Male age 40, preferred non-tobacco rate

Indexed Universal Life (IUL)

Goal #1: maximum cash value accumulation, income disbursements after retirement, no premiums in retirement

Design: minimum face amount, non-MEC (Modified Endowment Contract)
S&P 500 annual annual point-to-point with 100% Participation
5.00% index crediting all years
$500 monthly premium years 1-25, zero premiums thereafter to age 120
increasing death benefit years 1-25, level death benefit thereafter
maximum distributions years 26-30 (5 years) switch at basis from withdrawals to loans
$6,000 annual premium: guideline level premium $6,000.02 (non-MEC since it’s below guideline level)

Results: Company A
$104,115 increasing initial death benefit
non guaranteed results:
cash value accumulation $268,559 year 25. 
Maximum disbursements for 5 years, $59,640 assuming 4.50% variable rate. total $298,200 distributions over 5 years. Total premiums years 1-25: $150,000; net outlay ($148,200)
the policy projects coverage to age 120 without further premiums.  

Goal #2: target premium in order to build cash value and for coverage to last to age 120, flexible premiums for coverage to age 120 and cash value accumulation

Design: target premium
S&P 500 annual annual point-to-point with 100% Participation
5.00% index crediting all years
increasing death benefit all years

Results: Company A

$250 monthly premium  (target premium)
$209,644 initial increasing death benefit 
guideline level premium: $11,992.02 (maximum non-MEC annual)
maximum non-MEC annual premium $14,535.83, 7 pay test (annual)
monthly initial minimum premium $69.26 
cash value accumulation $105,527 year 25

$500 monthly premium (target premium) 
$491,287 initial increasing death benefit 
guideline level premium: $23,898.08 (maximum non-MEC annual)
maximum non-MEC annual premium $29,071.64, 7 pay test (annual)
monthly initial minimum premium $125.29
cash value accumulation $216,825 year 25. 

So with an IUL you can choose a target premium as your budget allows and have lots of flexibility to change premiums as circumstances warrant over the years from minimum to maximum non-MEC.  A target premium will not build as much cash value as in the Goal #1 design, minimizing the face amount and the maximum non-MEC premium, but it does quite well in building cash value and that does give you a much higher death benefit.

Please call with any questions, and to find out the name of the high performing carrier quoted.

IUL comparison for maximum cash value accumulation and tax-free loans

Male, age 44, standard non tobacco

$200,000 annual premium years 1-10, zero premium years 11+: total premium $2,000,000
5.00% interest crediting S & P 500 index annual point-to-point, all years.  This is not the maximum crediting allowed but helps compare carrier performance apples-to-apples.

structured maximum cash value accumulation, guideline level premium, minimum face amount, increasing death benefit, non-MEC guideline level premium test

Cash Value Accumulation (non guaranteed based on 5%)

Company A: $2,967,294 initial death benefit, year 20 cash value: $3,749,106, age 79 no lapse guarantee 
Company B: $3,255,183 initial death benefit, year 20 cash value: $3,352,877, age 93 no lapse guarantee 

Tax-Free Loans

Same structure as above except an increasing death benefit years 1-20, level death benefit years 21+, variable loan rate 4.50%

Company A: $803,212 loans years 21-25, total loans $4,0116,060  net outlay ($2,016,060)
Company B: $680,000 loans years 21-25, non guarantee lapse age 86

Comments: Even though company A projects clear advantages in cash value accumulation and policy loans, company B with its age 93 no lapse guarantee (NLG) indicates a fundamentally stronger product impervious to cost of insurance (COI) increases in or cap reductions, any carrier undermining of product support in the future.

Indexed Universal Life (IUL) quotes run April 2023. Please contact me to discuss these two competitive carriers.

, , , ,

Survivorship Indexed Universal Life for cash value accumulation

In a quote comparison of Survivorship Indexed Universal Life (IUL) products with cash value accumulation as the objective, Penn Mutual outperformed the competition with their “Survivor Plus IUL” plan.

A Surviviorship Indexed UL, second-to-die benefit, will tend outperform an individual Indexed UL for cash value accumulation.  The cost of insurance on two lives for one death benefit is lower than on a single life, so it makes sense for a couple to consider a survivorship product.

Here were the parameters for this case study:

Premium Amount: $250,000
Solve For:  Minimum Non-MEC *
Death Benefit Option: Increasing
Illustrative Rate assumption: 6% (all years);  S & P 500 annual point-to-point
insureds:  both mid ’50’s, both preferred non tobacco
objective: cash value accumulation, downside protection

Penn Mutual was able to solve as a “3 pay”, dividing the $250,000 premium into three annual payments, and maintain competitive cash value accumulation to a 4 pay, which is unusual.  When evaluating  a limited pay scenario, one works down from a “7 pay” non-MEC structure to see where optional cash value accumulation occurs. A 5 pay or 4 pay is most common.  Penn Mutual’s cash value accumulation was superior to the competition looking at years 5, 10, 15 and 20 and on out in 5 year increments.  PennMutual’s has a 2% floor on both its fixed and indexed account, giving their product superior downside protection.

Each case is different in age, health, premium amount and objectives, so it’s not a hard and fast conclusion that PennMutual Survivor IUL will be the superior product, but the next time a cash value accumulation case comes up Penn Mutual will be serve as a benchmark.

  •  Non-MEC =  not a Modified Endowment Contract

Indexed UL illustrations (IUL) reforms: the elusive level playing field

Rule changes commence on September 1st, 2015 for Indexed UL (IUL) illustration. The maximum illustrated rate for the S&P 500® Index will be capped based on a formula called the Benchmark Index Account, a rolling formula of all possible 25 year periods over the last 66 years. The formula for look-back periods used to be up to the carrier, invited cherry picking of the most favorable data sets, and fostered wide discrepancies on the maximum rates.

This rule change does not truly standardize interest rate assumptions. Using the same historical benchmark one might reasonably presume the illustration interest rates would be the same for every product. Nope. Take for example new S & P 500 annual point-to-point interest rate assumptions for three different companies for their products offered.

S & P 500 Annual Point-to-Point

Life Company A:
6.86%  product 1
6.45%  product 2

Life Company B:
7.17%  product 1
7.47%  product 2

Life Company C:
5.02%  product 1
6.00%  product  2
5.75%  product 3  survivor
6.00%  product 4

The interest rate assumption differ because the formula is partly derived the product’s current annual cap and those cap rates vary among products. Cap rates offer no fixed reference point because they are subject to change at the carrier’s discretion. At best there’s a guaranteed minimum cap rate of a few points. A current 13% cap rate could conceivably be reset to 3% twenty years from now. Cap rates have generally dropped at least a point or two since I began to actively monitor them in 2011 on my website.

Regardless, a higher interest rate does not necessarily project the highest cash values or death benefit. Cost of insurance charges affect cash value accumulation. Results vary considerably depending on assumptions. Projections based on such wide variables over long periods of time should be viewed with caution, not as hard values.

To help level the playing field, consumers need to request from agents competing product illustrations using the exact same interest rate assumption. At least one comparison should be at a low rate. For example a consumer should request illustrations run at 5% to compare the premium and cash value accumulation after 10, 20 and 30 years. Consumers should request multiple illustrations. Complete illustration are easy for agent to run and email, pdf format, to allow adequate time for someone considering purchasing life insurance to review. It’s useful to solve an illustration for $1 cash value at age 100, compare the premiums and run a second illustration with the premiums being equal. It’s informative to compare competing product illustrations at really low interest rate assumption like 3%. These sort of illustrations, squeezing out the upside maximum results, reveal better the underlying cost of insurance.

This IUL rule change is welcome reform, but by no means establishes a default starting point for comparisons. The new rules help make a level playing field, but it still requires effort to line up the teams. Ultimately, what’s required above and beyond is a comparison of the product and carrier’s underlying strength rather than tweaking out the highest maximum cash value accumulation.

Is Indexed Universal Life (IUL) Better Than UL?

Are Indexed Universal Life (IUL) products really better than regular UL?  Does the additional cost really justify an IUL?  For example take:

Male, age 52, preferred best rate class, $250,000 face amount

step #1.  Run a UL illustration solving to endow at age 100, increasing death benefit option.

Note: endow is worth it’s face amount, a $100,000 policy endows when it’s cash value equals $100,000.  Whole Life, the best quality par plans, are designed with increasing face amount and guaranteed to endow at age 100.  That high quality standard is what all UL and IUL  plans should be measured against.

#1 results:
UL: $5,000 annual premium  (rounding to nearest hundred)
Year 20: $121,000 cash value, $371,000 death benefit

Step #2. Run an Indexed UL illustration using the same assumptions, except interest crediting at one basis point, 1%, above the UL’s current interest rate.

#2 results:
Indexed UL: $6,400 premium
Year 20:  $157,400 cash value,  $407,400 death benefit

Note: The Indexed UL requires $1,400 more premium to build sufficient cash value to endow at age 100. Granted the IUL shows higher cash value and death benefit in year 20, but the premium is much higher.

Step #3. run an illustrations of the UL at the same premium as the IUL

#3 results:
UL: $6,400 premium
Year 20:  $164,500 cash value,  $414,500 death benefit

This UL product has better non-guaranteed projections than the Indexed UL, assuming a 4% interest rate and the Indexed UL a 5% interest rate.  Most agents probably quote an Indexed UL assuming interest rates of 7% or 8%, but that, to put it mildly, is very presumptuous.  All Index UL illustrations with interest rate assumptions being the same each and every year are highly improbable. That’s just not how equity indexes perform; they go up and down.  Index UL may have higher upside potential than a UL, but the carrier’s fundamentals are the same, and the hedging cost to cover and Indexed UL’s upside potential typically shows up in its cost of insurance.

 

Curt Herrmann - Sommermorgen

 

 

 

Reforming Indexed Universal Life (IUL) Illustrations

Life insurance agents market Indexed Universal Life (IUL) in large part by illustrations showing cash value returns based on interest rate crediting assumptions. The default rate for running an IUL quote is set by the carrier, and that’s based on historical index averages. Long historical look backs, often 30 years, generate the highest interest rate assumptions. To give a quote, agents can assume a lower credit rate by plugging in a lower percentage on the software, but the carrier default rate shows highest cash value accumulation, so the assumed rate, likely between 7% and 8.25%, has the strongest incentive to be presented. Some major life insurance carriers want this practice reformed, concerned that their eventual inaccuracy of the cash value accumulation will give everyone in the life industry a bad name.

Is there cause for concern?  Yes.  Some carriers who object primarily market whole life products, so the criticism is self serving, but their concern is legitimate.

Index UL products credit rate assumptions are up there. The most common index used for IULs is the S & P 500, and the historical average hovers around an 8.00% rate of return.  The illustration runs a steady 8% crediting rate every year until age 120. For a 35 year old, that’s 85 years straight.  Projections have great cash value figures at age 65, and loans for retirement income age 65 to age 100.  Impressive, but unrealistic.

One carrier doing business in New York has modified their illustration to show alternate values more prominently.  It look something like this:

Guaranteed Values Non-Guaranteed Values
(alternate)
Non-Guaranteed Values
.
 2.00%             4.00%          8.00%

Nothing really new.  Illustration signature pages already have a midpoint assumption. This just runs the values all the way out on the subsequent charts. Still the IUL illustration shows S & P 500 Index annual point interest crediting each and every year even if an alternate cuts the assumed return in half. Interest crediting is subject to cap, now hovering around 13%, but may be reset lower the guaranteed cap is around 4% for many plans.  Indexed ULs have a the zero percent floor guarantee.  How often will the index hit the floor to effect the average?  Showing the same crediting rate every year is harder to justify in the distribution phase for retirement income loans. Compare a 30 year history, to a 15 year history and add up the zeros, by counting 0, 1, 2, 8, 11, as in 2000, 2001, 2002, 2008, 2011.

Here’s a better proposal from Fred Anderson, a life actuary from the Minnesota Department of Insurance.  (emphasis mine)

“Principles that should be included, Andersen said, are a national index of credit rates no more than 1¼ to 2¼ percent higher than traditional universal credit rates; prominent side-by-side mid-point comparisons; the relationship between policy loan rates and credit rates “that addresses a problem there.”

Doing a survey of ten large life company UL credit rates on December 8, 2014, they showed most current assumption UL now credit in the 3% to 4% range. A few were 4% to 5%.  Adding 1¼ to 2¼ percent would mean Index UL illustrations should assume credit rates of 4.25% to at the most 7.00%.  As it stands now, a consumer is more likely to be shown 8% each and every year. It wouldn’t be difficult for life companies to have illustrations with interest rate variations to match actual historical returns, so the client could review cash values that reflect the typical historical ups and downs of index returns. It’s already done on indexed annuities proposals.  John Hancock‘s Indexed UL illustrations already have this option.

Recommendation: Consumers should request Index UL illustrations with non guaranteed credit rates no higher than 5.00% to 5.50%.  A constant crediting rate is unrealistic; consider cash value projections for comparison purposes only.

Posted 12/12/2014.  Interest rates subject to change.

Mountain scene mist rising unknown artist

IUL for retirement income

What is the best way to compare Index UL (IUL) companies for cash value accumulation and loans for retirement income?  Request illustrations be emailed to you. All life permanent life insurance, whole life, UL, or IUL with non guaranteed assumptions require illustrations for the insured’s review and signature.  A competent life broker has the ability to email multiple carrier illustrations for comparison purposes.  Make specific requests for the illustration’s structure, especially index interest rates assumptions. Insist each and every carrier use the same assumptions . Then compare cash value accumulation and loans for retirement income. Relative performance of the carriers, identifying the top performer, matters more than the figures themselves, which lack validity since they are projections over too long a period of time. To overfund an IUL request:

1.  Identical  assumptions: rate classification, premium amount, index rate, number of years paying premium, loan years

2. S & P 500 Index annual point-to-point; interest assumption of 5% or at most 5.50%

Commonly presented index interest rate returns of 7% to 8%+ each and every year over 20, 30, 40 years and longer are unrealistic and highly speculative

3. Minimum face amount. Guideline annual premium: Guideline premium test  (maximum non-MEC)

Work backwards from the amount of money intended for premiums to solve for the minimum face amount that’s still within the limits as a non modified endowment contract (MEC).  Come to the agent with a figure, as in, for example, wanting to put in $15,000 a year for the next 20 years.  The initial face amount will be solved from there; it will be made as low as possible to meet IRS guidelines.  

4. Increasing death benefit for premium payment years.

5.  Set the premium payment years from 20 to 30 years.  If older, allow at least 15 years, but usually a relatively short period of time, like 15 years, isn’t enough time to build sufficient cash value to allow for retirement income loans.

This is the accumulation period.  Compare cash accumulation after the accumulation period ends.  

6. Level death benefit all years in distribution period and thereafter to age 100 or age 120

7. Loans at fixed rate or maximum variable capped rate

Ask if variable loan rate is capped. Variable loan rates are frequently based on Moody’s Corporate Bond Yield index and those rates have been much higher in the past than currently.

8. Distributions starting at age 65 or after set number of years of accumulation

9. Limited distribution period to 5, 10 or 15 years

Compare which carrier has the higher values, but do not place weight in the amount which is not a reliable value when the index interest rate return assumption is a constant

10. Solve for cash value of at least $1,000 at age 100 or $1 at age 120

Example:  male, age 35, preferred plus, $12,000 premiums 30 years at increasing death benefit; zero premiums thereafter at level death benefit; 5.50% S & P 500 annual point-to-point, minimum Non-MEC, guideline premium test, solve for maximum distributions 15 years, variable loan option at cap 5.5%, monthly loans, solve for $1,000 cash surrender value age 100

key figures to review in the illustration’s yearly summary charts:

  • year 30 – most cash value accumulation
  • years 31-46 – highest annual loans

Mt. Hood, Illustration by R.S. Gifford