Hybrid life insurance with LTC benefits: tap into or pass on

Watering-troughs_in_the_Wadi_Ghuzze_-_early_morning_Art.IWMART1518
Baby boomers postponing purchasing long term care insurance, despite what may be going on in their parents advanced age, have plenty of reasons to balk at conventional LTC plans.

One of the six primary reasons people do not buy long term care insurance.  pdf

Sixth, the structure of policies themselves (benefits
denominated in dollars per day, inflation risk of purchasing insurance for an event that is probabilistically far away, increases in premiums for everyone when insurance companies face insolvency, denial of applications) reduces purchase rates.

Potential premium rate increases, big ones, are are the glaring weakness of stand alone LTC plan. The track record of existing policies has not been good with the double digit premium increases over the past few years.

To the rescue for viable avenue of coverage, Hybrid life/LTC insurance offers rate stability. Guaranteed Universal Life (GUL) products lock in a fixed premium guaranteed for life.  The majority of these GUL products come with some sort of accelerated benefit targeted for long term care.

Hybrid Life plans provide a benefit one way or another. If you never need LTC coverage, your beneficiaries get the life insurance. Then if long-term care becomes a necessity, accelerate out a portion of the benefit. It may be only a small portion of the benefit ends up being needed; the rest can remain as a life insurance benefit.

Life hybrids are not perfect. Look for plans that specifically titled “long-term care” for more comprehensive benefit. Life policies with “chronic care” accelerated benefits are not as inclusive as their long term care benefit counterparts. With chronic care, the condition must likely be permanent. That benefit threshold would be a problem with for example a stroke, however debilitating a stroke might be, it may be considered to be recoverable. Many more conditions like a broken hip are not going to qualify for a chronic care benefit where they would if the plan’s benefits are full fledged long-term care.

There are other limitations that pull from the edges of rock solid LTC coverage. For example, the structure of benefit is generally limited by a monthly amount or daily maximum tied to the HIPAA per diem limit currently allowed by IRS rules, but just review carefully what’s optimal given the choices for plans and your situation.

Look for plans that have indemnity benefit, paid in cash, rather than reimbursement: better to receive a check than submit bills to be repaid.

How much coverage is enough?

Fifth, a sizable portion of the population has neither sufficient wealth to protect nor income to pay long-term care insurance premiums.

Most people have a desire to leave something to their children, or if nothing else, not be a financial burden on their children. It’s hard to judge how much money would be needed to cover LTC.  It really runs the gambit but coverage for $100,000 provides at least something. One life plan with chronic care starts at a $25,000 face amount.

With the exception of certain plans like Lincoln National’s MoneyGuard, hybrid life benefits do not provide inflation protection. LTC benefits are no higher than the death benefit. Chronic Care plans have no upfront charge, but reduce the benefit with a discount charge. How big a policy is enough if determined by the face amount: $100k, $250k, $1m?  The solution to choose a plan that builds cash value with an increasing face amount death benefit, either an Indexed Universal Life or a Current Assumption UL, to access cash value through policy loans or partial surrenders.

Hybrid life premiums with accelerated living benefits for LTC are affordable, not for or some worst case scenario like Alzheimer’s, but still something is better for nothing. There are hybrid life plans with $100,000 to $250,000 face amounts for people in their 50’s or 60’s with reasonable premiums. Chronic Care riders have no up front charge for the benefit. Check them out by reviewing the sample quotes by age on this website.

Indexed Universal Life (IUL): adding a dose of realism to quotes

Franklin Booth, illustration for “The Flying Islands of the Night” , 1913

When shopping for Indexed Universal Life (IUL) agents ought to provide quotes with full illustrations. Indexed UL illustration are easy for an experienced agent to quickly run. They’re about 10 pages long, can be generated in a pdf file format and emailed. Insist on a full illustration, not a summary. Insist on the illustration being emailed for review. That’s what you’ll get if you contact me. Agents have the latitude to present these illustrations with maximum index interest rate assumptions, which for the S & P 500 Index interest rates ranging from 7.50% to over 8.25%. Not unlikely to see the highest allowed rate assumption, since it’s the default rate on the quote software, and especially because the results look better. Those maximum rates are justified by the index’s historical average over the last 25, 30 or 40 years.

The most common index used is the S & P 500. Here is S & P 500 yearly returns since 1975. Since we’re dealing here with Indexed ULs, translate those numbers to a cap, current caps generally run 11% to 16% percent, and a floor usually 0% or with a few carriers 1%. Now after seeing how the S & P has moved historically, factor in unguaranteed double digit caps, how can an illustration showing 8% interest rate returns in all years be justified?  All years for a 35 year old means 65 years in a row, out to age 100, or even longer.

0, 1, 2, 8, 11
The S & P 500 had zero or negative returns in 2000, 2001, 2002, 2008 and 2011.  How would that 15 year historical performance translate in IUL performance? For someone for example 40 years old having an accumulation phase of 25 years, some down years over that time span has a chance to be absorbed by positive years, but what about the distribution phase when some are targeting IULs for maximum loans? That could be a real problem, and that sort of scenario is masked by maximum interest rate assumptions in all years.

Penn Mutual has an excellent quote illustration system that allows the agent to put in either the maximum interest rate or an assumed interest rate and two alternate assumed interest rate scenarios, so illustrations can show a total of three interest rate assumptions. Also interest rates can be input year by year. Penn Mutual also can generate a IUL historical report which shows 20, 30, 40, 50 or 60 years historical index returns and how that translated to their current 13% cap and guaranteed 1% floor.

Request lower interest rates for added realism
Illustrations should be run in the 5% to 5.5% range to take into account years where the floor is met, if caps rates come down, or if cost of insurance is increased.  Even better, run an illustration, as possible with Penn Mutual, with multiple interest rate assumptions plugged in year by year.  Regardless, of how they are run, all IUL illustrations should be view as very hypothetical, at best a general projection.

Cash Value Life Insurance Choices

Santiago Rusiñol. Calvario marlloquí

Whole Life: life insurance participating, or par

  • Dividends
  • Builds Cash Value
  • Guaranteed Cash Value Accumulation
  • Endow, worth face amount in cash, at age 100 or age 121
  • Increasing face amount
  • Cash dividends option, after a period of years
  • Paid Up Insurance
  • Cash value protects policy if payments are missed
  • Coverage guaranteed to age 100 or age 121

Pros: Since it builds on top of guaranteed cash value, par whole life has highest potential for cash value accumulation, flexible to changing circumstances; good to start for children, in 20’s, 30’s or upper income
Cons: much more expensive than Universal Life (UL) or Indexed Universal Life (IUL)

Indexed Universal Life:  IUL

  • Builds Cash value, higher upside potential with index crediting then current assumption UL
  • some guaranteed cash value accumulation, not all years
  • Flexible on payments
  • Option for increasing face amount, option B
  • Cash value protects policy if payments are missed
  • Policy lapses with zero cash value

Pros: less expensive than Whole Life, flexible to changing circumstances
Cons: if underfunded and or performs poorly can lapse without additional premium; higher cost of insurance charges than UL, periodic review is advisable, more complex, more choices to make than current assumption UL

Universal Life: UL, current assumption UL

  • Builds Cash value
  • Flexible on payments
  • Option for increasing face amount, option B
  • Cash value protects policy if payments are missed
  • Policy lapses with zero cash value

Pros: less expensive than Indexed UL, flexible to changing circumstances, lower cost of insurance charges than Indexed UL
Cons: if underfunded and or poor interest credited can lapse without additional premium

Whole Life: non-participating, non-par

  • guaranteed cash value accumulation

Pros:  fixed premium, guaranteed cash value accumulation, endow at age 100 or age 120; good for final expense
Cons: level death benefit; cash surrender value matter little compared to death benefit

Guaranteed Indexed Universal Life: GIUL

  • cash value accumulation, generally not in 80’s and older

Pros:  lifetime guarantee, or set guarantee year
Cons: lower casher value accumulation than Indexed UL

Guaranteed Universal Life:  Guaranteed UL, GUL,  no lapse guarantee UL

  • Little to no cash value accumulation

Pros: least expensive lifetime guarantee age 120+, also least expensive setting guarantee to age 90, 95, 100, 105, 110 or whatever length desired;  ability to structure longer guarantees, and at older ages than term life, for example 30 year guarantee at age 59
Cons: missed premium payments lapse policy, little to no cash value accumulation
Return of Premium Term:   ROP term

  • guaranteed cash value accumulation
  • reduced paid up insurance with some carriers

Pros:  At the end of the term you get all your premiums back; builds cash value, mostly in the last years of the term period
Cons:  death benefit same as term if you pass away, cash value not included; more expensive than term, especially after mid 40’s

Cash value life insurance vs. term and invest the difference: is that the only choice?

Last week Seeking Alpha posted an article where a 38 year old man, presumably an investment broker, passed on his life insurance agent’s advice for a permanent life insurance product with a $5,000 annual premium, and instead choose term coverage for $600 a year. He took cash value life insurance to task with the self-serving advice to buying term and investing the difference.

OK.  No real argument there. At age 38, or for that matter for any working age person, term offers more bang for the buck, and that’s the most affordable way to replace lost income and thus protect a spouse or dependents.  But did this gentleman get enough coverage?

Term: How much and how long
He’s to spend $600 a year in premium.  Let’s review the most competitive rates and see what $600 a year buys.  A male preferred non-tobacco with SBLI (Savings Bank Life Insurance of Massachusetts), $800,000 of 20 year term is $596 a year. 25 year term $525,000 face amount is $600.75 a year with SBLI.  The rule of thumb is had 7 to 10 time one’s annual salary in life insurance. If he has children, there’s a college fund to consider.  Whether this individual got sufficient coverage depends on how much he makes, but keep in mind the goal is to get an adequate amount, and if affordable extend coverage to retirement age or to a point the children would be expected to have finished their secondary or post secondary education: age 22 or age 26.

Term and Permanent:  Two Plans – Two Purposes
Term verses permanent life insurance is a fallacious argument, as if it’s either one or the other. You can set up two policies: one term to replace lost income during your working years and a permanent for estate planning and to build cash value.  For this 38 year old, instead of a $800k 20 year term, how about a $100,000 of permanent life insurance and $700,000 in term?  A $100,000 Indexed Universal Life “Lincoln LifeReserve Indexed UL Accumulator” with Lincoln National, increasing face amount, targeted to endow at age 100, is $1,511 annual for male, age 38, preferred. That quote assumes 5% interest on S & P 500 index, annual point-to-point. At 5% that projects $33,803 cash surrender value and a $133,803 death benefit after 20 years.  Add a $700,000 20 year term with SBLI for $529 annual, that comes to $2,040 annual total cost for the two plans, and the Indexed UL is a very flexible premium, up or down depending on index returns or personal finances. This way after 20 years this person, now in his late 50’s, doesn’t have to encounter much more expensive choices in establishing permanent coverage for estate planning and with the right plan a chronic care or LTC rider in case LTC is needed.

There is also return of premium (ROP) term.  $800,000 20 year ROP term is $3,072 annual with American General for a 38 year old male at preferred.  In 20 years that guarantees $61,440 cash back or $170,218 in paid up life insurance.  After 20 years that paid up life insurance might be an appealing choice.  You could do a mix of ROP term and regular level term to lower that cost.

Please contact me for a free and confidential quote.  Many more options available.

sean's profile picLicensed Agent:  Sean Drummey
phone:  (910) 328-0447
email:    spdrummey@gmail.com

Trigger Method Fixed Indexed Universal Life (IUL) with Allianz

Henryk_Weyssenhoff_Spring_1911

Allianz recently announced enhancements to their Fixed Indexed Universal Life (IUL) product Life Pro+.  Why does Allianz call it fixed?  Well, that’s their terminology.  Known mostly as Indexed Universal Life (IUL) or sometimes as Equity Indexed UL (EIUL), the name may differ, but all these Indexed UL products have interest returns tied to a market index, most commonly the S & P 500 Index, and have a floor guarantee of at least 0% as downside protection against losses. That’s why Allianz presumably uses the word fixed as opposed to Variable UL which does not have a 0% floor.

One noteworthy feature in Allianz’s enhancements is a trigger method of interest crediting. If the S & P 500 Index annual point to point hits anywhere greater or equal to zero, will trigger 9% credited to the policy. This Trigger Interest Rate is subject to change on an annual basis but is guaranteed never to go below 2.50%. In years the S & P goes below zero, the floor crediting rate is 0%, and if the index measures in that annual point to point above 9%, the credit remains at 9%.

Most of the Indexed UL product caps are currently in the 11% to 13% range and in this strong market those higher caps make them a more alluring crediting strategy. Historical data does not show that 0% to 9% range to be as prevalent as 10% or higher. Allianz still offers the higher capped S& P 500 annual point-to-point option. Their trigger method is an added option in times when S & P 500 performance expectations were not very high.

AIG pays back TARP funds and its effect on American General Life Insurance Company

I saw one of AIG’s “Thank You America” commercials this weekend, and that’s how I found out that AIG had paid back in full their TARP bail out money.  That’s good news for American General Life Insurance Company.  I’ve been an agent for American General for over a decade, well before they were acquired by AIG back in 2001.

American General’s independent ratings have declined since AIG’s liquidity crisis 2008 and now have stabilized.  2008 exposed the ratings system to be very flawed, and since the rating system has not been reformed, it is a tenuous means to judge a carrier.  From a life insurance agent’s point of view, to recommend a carrier is in part observing a life insurance company’s price and product changes, underwriting practices and rules for term conversion. It’s also telling how much interest they are crediting on current policy holder’s permanent plans.

There is also a distinction between recommending a life product that’s guaranteed, and those that are non guaranteed, that depend on crediting interest to the policy for cash value.  A guaranteed no-lapse universal life, G-UL, is very straight forward, as opposed to a performance based product like indexed universal life, IUL, or a traditional UL.  Term or return of premium term has a guaranteed level rate for a fixed period of time, but conversion options to a permanent plan without evidence of insurability is another key consideration, especially since so many people run into health problems in the 10, 20 or 30 years after their policy is taken out.

I will take a wait and see approach to American General.   They can prove their worth by proportionately crediting of their UL policy holders and expanding conversion options.